Archive for the 'Drug and Device Law' Category

Off-Label Use – The Times They Are A Changin’

We’ve decided to get a couple of off-label use-related items off of our to-do-eventually list today. The first we’ve alluded to already. It’s the First Amendment litigation that Allergan recently commenced against the FDA involving the truthful “promotion” of off-label use (specifically use of Botox to treat muscle spasticity). The second is a new law [...]

Correction To Guest Post "Counting To Seven"

Yeah, it happens. None of us are perfect. We have been given the following correction to the recent guest post on the upcoming changes to deadlines under the federal rules:
Thanks again for publishing my guest column. Unfortunately, part of it was wrong. Neville Boschert, a sharp lawyer in Jackson Mississippi, pointed out that [...]

Third Circuit Speaks On When An MDL Court Can Be Second-Guessed After Remand

This guest post was submitted to us by Ronni Fuchs, a partner at Bexis’ firm, Dechert LLP. She gets the credit (and the blame) for what follows.
From time to time we grapple with the question of the authority of a trial court to which an MDL court remands cases to vacate or reform rulings issued [...]

Yeah, Yeah – We Know

We know about Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., so stop bugging us. In fact, it’s been on our drug preemption scorecard for a few days now, complete with a link to the slip opinion. If you read about it on 360, who do you think sent it to them?
We can’t do everything, and we’re not [...]

Off-Label Promotion – Scratch One Flat Suit

“Scratch One Flat Top” marked the sinking of an enemy aircraft carrier in the Battle of the Coral Sea.
In the battle over off-label promotion, scratch another lawsuit. Central Regional Employees Benefit Fund v. Cephalon, 2009 U.S. Dist. Lexis 93636 (D.N.J. Oct. 7, 2009), sends another would-be third party payor fraud suit to the bottom, [...]

Why Subverting Court Orders Is A Bad Idea

Arthur Parker ingested Upsher-Smith Laboratories’ drug amiodarone, developed pulmonary difficulties, and died. His widow brought a product liability action against Upsher Smith.
Lawyers for Upsher-Smith wanted to interview some of Parker’s treating physicians. Plaintiff opposed those ex parte interviews, saying that Nevada law prohibits the interviews and that waivers granted under HIPAA do not [...]

Counting To Seven: New Federal Rules Change How Due Dates in Litigation are Calculated

Charles R. Beans, of Goodman McGuffey Lindsey & Johnson, LLP, in Atlanta, contributed the following guest post. We thank him for his contribution, and present his words:
“Just another stupid thing that I done wrong.”– Goldfinger, “Counting the Days” © 2000.
[Okay, okay. We started with lyrics froms Goldfinger. But now we give you Chuck's words:]
Unless Congress [...]

Upcoming Speaking Engagements

The calm of Summer has ended, and that means we’ll once again start trotting around the country to give talks. Here’s the current line-up for the next three months:
October 2: The two of us will speak to the editors of the American Bar Association’s many websites about effective blogging and drawing traffic to a site.
(Pssst: [...]

TortsProf Mondays

The TortsProf blog recently started inviting torts scholars to publish guest posts on Monday mornings.
This is a nice addition to the blog. No matter how prolific a thinker you are, you’ll run out of new and clever topics for your blog after you’ve written your first, say, 1000 posts. (Just ask us.) [...]

More On Moving To Dismiss MDL Master Complaints

We raised an electronic eyebrow last month when we stumbled across In re NuvaRing Prods. Liab. Litig., slip op., No. 4:08MD1964 RWS (E.D. Mo. Aug. 6, 2009) (link here).
There, the MDL Panel created a coordinated proceeding to administer the 150 individual lawsuits pleading personal injuries allegedly caused by using Organon’s contraceptive NuvaRing. The MDL transferee [...]